首页> 外文OA文献 >Intentional forgetting in dysphoria:investigating the inhibitory effects of thought substitution using independent cues
【2h】

Intentional forgetting in dysphoria:investigating the inhibitory effects of thought substitution using independent cues

机译:烦躁中的有意遗忘:使用独立线索研究思维替代的抑制作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Individuals with clinical and subclinical depression (dysphoria) exhibit problems intentionally forgetting unwanted memories on the think/no-think (TNT) paradigm (Anderson & Green, 2001). However, providing substitute words to think about instead of the to-be-forgotten targets can improve forgetting in depressed patients. Objectives To determine if thought substitution can enhance forgetting in dysphoric participants and to examine the potential mechanisms (blocking or inhibition) that might underpin successful forgetting. Methods Thirty-six dysphoric and 36 non-dysphoric participants learned neutral word-pairs and then practiced responding with the targets to some cues (think trials) and suppressing responses to others (no think trials). Half the participants were provided with substitute words to recall instead of the original targets (aided suppression) and half were simply told to avoid thinking about the targets (unaided suppression). Finally, participants completed two recall tests for the targets; one cued with the original probes and one with independent probes. Results Regardless of suppression condition (aided or unaided), dysphoric participants exhibited impaired forgetting, relative to their non-dysphoric counterparts, but only when cued with the original probes. Furthermore, higher depression scores were associated with poorer forgetting. In the aided condition, successful forgetting was observed on both the original and independent probe tasks, which supports the inhibitory account of thought substitution. Limitations Non-clinical status of the dysphoric participants was not confirmed using a validated measure. Conclusions Findings do not support the utility of thought substitution as a method of improving the forgetting in depressed participants, but do support the inhibition account of thought substitution.
机译:背景患有临床和亚临床抑郁症(烦躁不安)的人表现出一些问题,这些问题有意识地遗忘了思考/不思考(TNT)范式中的多余记忆(Anderson&Green,2001)。但是,提供替代词来思考而不是要被遗忘的目标可以改善抑郁症患者的遗忘。目的确定思维替代是否可以增强烦躁不安参与者的遗忘,并研究可能构成成功遗忘基础的潜在机制(阻断或抑制)。方法36名烦躁不安的参与者和36名非烦躁不安的参与者学习了中性的单词对,然后练习对目标做出某些提示的响应(思考试验),并抑制对其他提示的响应(无思考试验)。一半的参与者被提供了替代单词来代替原来的目标(辅助压制)来回忆,而一半的参与者被告知避免考虑目标(无助抑制)。最后,参与者完成了针对目标的两次召回测试。一种暗示使用原始探针,另一种暗示使用独立探针。结果不论抑制条件如何(辅助或无辅助),烦躁不安的参与者相对于非烦躁不安的参与者而言,其遗忘功能均受损,但仅当使用原始探针提示时才如此。此外,较高的抑郁评分与较差的遗忘有关。在辅助条件下,在原始探查任务和独立探查任务中都观察到成功的遗忘,这支持了思想替代的抑制作用。局限性烦躁不安的参与者的非临床状态未使用经过验证的措施进行确认。结论结论并不支持将思想替代作为改善沮丧参与者遗忘的一种方法,但它支持思想替代的抑制作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号